You are currently viewing Understanding Language Vitality and Reclamation as Resilience: A Framework for Language Endangerment and “Loss” (Commentary on Mufwene)

Understanding Language Vitality and Reclamation as Resilience: A Framework for Language Endangerment and “Loss” (Commentary on Mufwene)

Fitzgerald, C. M. (2017). Understanding language vitality and reclamation as resilience: A framework for language endangerment and’loss'(Commentary on Mufwene). Language93(4), e280-e297.

Abstract

Drawing extensively from Indigenous scholarship, I argue for more holistic and inclusive notions of language and language vitality. This enables a better understanding of language revitalization’s role as a protective factor, as well as how to evaluate its success. I present data from the Indigenous communities of the U.S. and Canada showing that language shift correlates with a host of negative outcomes: educational, economic and well-being. In contrast, language revitalization may confer protective effects, suggesting that it is better understood through resilience. A more holistic framework also provides an intellectually coherent integration of language revitalization, language documentation, and language itself.